There's been no discussion since this revision.
The Chairs have asked for a couple of reviews. I've asked a couple of
folks, but haven't had any response.

Looking for a few folks to do a close read. Send notes to the list, and
I'll make necessary revisions. If it's baked, I think there's consensus.

Thanks,

Lee

On 2/15/15, 11:56 AM, "Lee Howard" <l...@asgard.org> wrote:

>Per discussion, I have added the four use cases discussed at a previous
>meeting.  
>The "Recommendations" section is now "Considerations and Recommendations."
>The guidance from the WG was that ISPs should be advised of how PTRs are
>used, so they can decide how important it is to populate them. I left in
>the recommendations from before, since an ISP might decide it's important.
>
>I think the references to other ongoing work are up to date, but let me
>know if I've missed anything, please.
>
>We had pretty strong support the last time we discussed aloud (spontaneous
>applause).  Is this document ripe for publication?
>
>
>Thanks,
>Lee
>
>On 2/15/15 11:46 AM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>A new version of I-D, draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt
>>has been successfully submitted by Lee Howard and posted to the
>>IETF repository.
>>
>>Name:         draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns
>>Revision:     07
>>Title:                Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers
>>Document date:        2015-02-16
>>Group:                Individual Submission
>>Pages:                14
>>URL:            
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt
>>Status:         
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns/
>>Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07
>>Diff:           
>>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   In IPv4, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) commonly provide IN-
>>   ADDR.ARPA information for their customers by prepopulating the zone
>>   with one PTR record for every available address.  This practice does
>>   not scale in IPv6.  This document analyzes different approaches and
>>   considerations for ISPs in managing the ip6.arpa zone for IPv6
>>   address space assigned to many customers.
>>
>>                 
>>        
>>
>>
>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission
>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>The IETF Secretariat
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>DNSOP@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to