On 26Mar15, David C Lawrence allegedly wrote: > At IETF this week it was decided to refocus the effort on the > edns-client-subnet draft on only documenting the existing behaviour of > deployed implementations.
That's disappointing and somewhat at odds with the theme of the on-list discussions since the last draft was posted. Oh well. > To clarify some areas that were un/under-specified I am looking for > implementers of both recursive and authoritative servers at the Given that the major public caches have all adopted a whitelist approach to participating auths, one presumes that their whitelists represent all deployed implementations. Mark.
pgpxt6u0oNj8s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
