On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:19:16PM +0000, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 16 lines which said:
> We've been hammering out the agenda, and we've got more requests than we > have time. We're focusing on working group items; heavy discussion items on > the mailing list; and other specific items we feel need pointing out. We'll > have a draft one out this this weekend. I did not see a formal announce but, anyway, here it is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/92/agenda/dnsop/ There is little timing, except for the first two items. I'm concerned by the number of "possible new work", specially when compared with the existing work (for instance, draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies, draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet and draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis, all important works, seem to have no slot: does it mean everyone is OK as they are?) May be all discussions about RFC 6761 and its followups could be moved to a special session (because of the huge potential for lengthy discussions)? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
