Tony Finch wrote: > > On 6 Mar 2015, at 22:53, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > >>>> if you want to change how DNSSEC works, i'll listen. ... >>> ... implementing RRSIG >>> is as hard as implementing ANY with regard to the aspect that you have >>> to use/look for more than one query type, which is different from >>> all other query types. >> >> i see. so, are you proposing to change the way DNSSEC works, or not? > I think Ralf is right that QTYPE=RRSIG is weird just like ANY, in that it is asking for (part of) all? any? RRsets at a given owner name. I wonder how caches handle it... > Since DNSSEC does not use or need QTYPE=RRSIG, I do not see how deprecating it would require any changes to DNSSEC.
ok, i'm convinced. (olafur, please note?) -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
