Paul, Marek and I agree with you to expand the scope to include all meta types at Authoratitive servers.
And address your other points as well, thanks for the support. Olafur On Mar 6, 2015 11:28 PM, "Paul Vixie" <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > this made the news tonight: > > > Tracking Flags: > > tracking-firefox36: + > > status-firefox36: fixed > > tracking-firefox37: + > > status-firefox37: fixed > > tracking-firefox38: + > > status-firefox38: fixed > > tracking-firefox39: + > > status-firefox39: fixed > > relnote-firefox: 36+ > > > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093983) > > notes-- > > 1. i support the adoption and progression of olafur's draft, regardless > of mozilla's retraction of the bad logic in tonight's firefox release. > > 2. it's not going to change the amplification/reflection problem and > should not mention that problem at all. > > 3. it should be renamed to "restricting DNS meta-data queries". > > 4. it should be expanded to include RD=0 against recursion-only servers, > IXFR/AXFR, and anything else in the DNS protocol that would be useful > for both diagnostics and surveillance. > > 5. non-response to these queries should be designed to avoid re-query > storms from common initiators. > > i agree to review and contribute. > > vixie > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
