On Feb 28, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:

> I see <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/92/agenda.html> we have a
> slot on Tuesday but I cannot find a discussion about an agenda. It's
> specially important since we have a _lot_ of work on the bench
> <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html>

Yes, we're working on it, and even though there's not been an official request, 
please let us know what you think the priorities are.

> 
> I believe that draft-hoffman-dns-terminology, although not WG item,
> deserves a slot since it is a very important work, everything else
> potentially depending on it.

Thanks for this input.
> 
> I do not ask immediately a slot for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation since it seems the biggest
> problems are the lack of reviews (and the lack of running code but I'm
> working on it). Reviewers, please go ahead!

We have that problem  with several drafts, and it even has an impact on the 
ability to plan for Dallas.

Reviewers, your input is critical to authors, the group, and the chairs in 
planning our work. Don't be shy!


thanks,
Suzanne & Tim
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to