Hi Stephane, Thanks for bringing this up, actually it's a great draft, I was not aware of it. Recently I published a post in my personal blog an article -in Spanish- called something like: "The bad idea of blocking Internet". It's about the problem that is left after performing the blocking, things like if you block one IP address for a certain website and then this websites changes from IP to another IP, then the ISPs are not un-blocking the old-IP. If the blocked IP is a shared service or virtualhosting then many services will be denied, etc, etc. I wonder if this information should be added to the draft (well, I honestly I don't think so)
My post in Spanish - original- http://blog.acostasite.com/2014/10/la-mala-idea-de-bloquear-internet.html Google translation into English: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.acostasite.com%2F2014%2F10%2Fla-mala-idea-de-bloquear-internet.html&edit-text= Thanks, Alejandro, El 11/7/2014 a las #4, Stephane Bortzmeyer escribió: > There is an Internet-Draft "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship > Techniques" draft-hall-censorship-tech-00 which is on the agenda of > the Security Area Open Meeting next week at IETF 91 Honolulu. > > I applaud the effort, I've reviewed the DNS part and I find it of low > quality, with sloppy terminology. I sent my remarks to the authors but > may be I was not constructive enough and the good people at DNSOP will > want to do their own review and comment on it? [No venue for > discussion is mentioned in the draft.] > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
