In message <545b54d3.50...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta writes: > Paul Vixie wrote: > > >>> Right, NXDOMAIN returned by some broken implementation to empty > >>> non-terminals MUST NOT be interpreted that the terminals does not > >>> exist. > > > > i disagree with this. broken implementations who emit NXDOMAIN for > > empty non-terminals cannot be used as an excuse not to develop and > > deploy correct protocol and software enhancements. > > My suggestion is just for robust minimization without sacrificing > the correctness as NXDOMAIN for full domain name is interpreted > as is. > > > the internet has > > hundreds of years to run yet, and these broken implementations are > > (a) shrinking not growing, and (b) subject to rapid replacement when > > they start to encounter problems with correct enhancements to their > > habitat. > > How widely is EDNS deployed?
http://users.isc.org/~marka/ts.html > IIRC, about 20 years ago, you said 2KB DNS message of DNSSEC > was not a problem because EDNS takes care of it. > > Masataka Ohta > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
