Isn't "doing the minimum necessary to get the job done" pretty much the
definition of "optimization" (or, for that matter, "efficiency")? "Minimize"
means, basically, only "to make small"; whereas "optimization" or "efficiency"
means to reduce something, relative to something else, for a particular purpose
or to achieve a particular end.
_De_gustabis_. I don't have any strong preferences one way or the other, I just
think shortening QNAMEs is an odd way to _introduce_ what the proposal purports
to do. Once one comprehends the gist of the proposal, then it makes sense, but
for historical reference and information retrieval, one wants to choose a title
that most intuitively yet concisely describes what is/was proposed.
- Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Vixie [mailto:p...@redbarn.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:35 PM
To: Darcy Kevin (FCA)
Cc: dnsop
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-00.txt
the term "query minimization" appeals to me since each server, during
iteration, sees the minimum substring of the qname needed.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
