All
The call period ended earlier this week. The only outspoken nay was Peter Koch. His reasons may prove to be true, as many have said. But the consensus is to adopt the work, and see where it takes us.
The new version has been submitted in the document list. Based on the discussion, I've initially labeled the draft 'Experimental', with the idea that if the initial research looks promising, this can be changed. Actually, this can be changed if there is some larger voice on this.
thanks all tim On 10/7/14 12:04 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
Dear DNSOP WG, After discussions about the landing spot of this document, DNSOP vs the newer DNS Privacy WG, it was realized the updated DNSOP charter specifically had work like this in mind. This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-bortzmeyer-dns-qname-minimisation. The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-dns-qname-minimisation/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. This call for adoption ends Monday 20-October-2014 at 23:59 Thanks tim wicinski DNSOP co-chair
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
