Hello,
We actually put all our efforts to change the document thoroughly and not
only consider the IPv4 scenario that was comment of some people in
mailinglist but also we expand the DNS privacy section and explained it in
more detail (no need to change the protocol.)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig-08
So, any more comments? Any more feedback? do you think it is now a good
acceptable version? :-)
Best,
Hosnieh
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
