Just to be clear: Warren asked for feedback with an open mind. If you read the draft, you'll see Warren and I explicitly handwave. Also, note that at the moment, he and I disagree about some of the suggestions, just like it seems that some people here so far do. FWIW, I currently prefer the result to be a more robust cache (something that acts just like a cache but also knows how to synthesize NXDOMAIN for things not in the root), and Warren prefers the result to be a less robust slave (something that does not have as close of a relationship with the master as what we normally think, but gives authoritative answers).
That's fine: it is supposed to be a consensus document and we aren't there yet. My hope is that DNSOP doesn't become too DNSEXT-like where if the -00 for a proposal isn't universally loved, it is destroyed instead of worked on. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
