On 20 maj 2014, at 05:54, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > if we decide that web servers can be reached by SRV records, then any web > client can start looking for the SRV that describes that service, falling > back to whatever tin-cups-and-string it did before if it can't find the SRV > it wants. > > in that sense mark andrews' HTTP SRV I-D from all those years ago should not > have been controversial. "if you want to do this, here's how everybody else > agreed to do it."
Speaking as an Applications Area Director of the time when SRV records where proposed I completely agree. Algorithm should be defined by the service, and when done, it should be implemented and used. Can we not with HTTP/2 please push SRV forward? Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
