On 4/22/14, 6:43 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Edward Lewis <edlewis.subscri...@cox.net> writes:
I feel terminology of "agent" in the draft is annoying.
I strongly agree with that. Parental “Agent” is too broad.
The choice was to keep consistent terminology with:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-11
I don't think we want these terminology sets to deviate.
We don't want the terminology to deviate, nor do we want the
Capitalization to deviate either. I have an editor note to go back
over the draft verifying this.
tim
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
