At Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:58:45 -0400, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance/ > Please take a look at version -10 of this draft. I believe that the > authors have addressed all the issues that were raised during the very > comment period. > > I believe that draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-10 has > reach working group consensus. I urge folks to give it one last look > and if there is anything you wish to raise, please raise directly, > otherwise silence is agreement. Just from a quick scan, I'm afraid this point wasn't addressed: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg11648.html If it's based on a consensus that it's not worth noting, I'm fine with that (after all, I now understand the rationale, so my comment is for helping future readers, not me), but as far as I know there was not even any followup/discussion on it, so I guess it was simply buried in the volume of the recent traffic. -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
