On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:14:31AM -0800, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote a message of 45 lines which said:
> > I don't think that a RRset can be "possibly truncated". Either it is > > truncated (not sent in its entirety) and the TC bit is set, the > > resolver does not have to guess, or it is not truncated. There is > > never an ambiguity. (Unless you use "truncation" in the sloppy sense I > > criticized above.) > > are you advising (by implication) that a receiver who hears TC=1 with > ANCOUNT>0 or NSCOUNT>0 or ADCOUNT>0 treat it as a FORMERR? No. And there is no path from what I wrote to this strange conclusion. You can have several RRsets in an answer, and some can be intact and complete. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
