On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > As well as Joe's AS112 argument there is also the question of DNSSEC > validation - but perhaps we don't want non-DNS names to make any kind of > sense in this respect... cf. .local
Indeed, it doesn't make much sense to me that special-use names that are not intended to be resolved using the DNS should be validateable via DNSSEC. If they can be validated, it would have to be using whatever protocol is being used for name resolution (if any). _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
