On 3 Mar 2014, at 13:12, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote: > On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: >> I suggest that it's entirely plausible for someone to choose a DNS-namespace >> anchor for their non-DNS namespace that is as stable as they want, depending >> on their needs. > > This is clearly not the case for an open protocol spec, though, since there > is no one entity that could be responsible for maintaining the registration.
Certainly there could be cases where that is true. I can't think of an example from the candidates we've identified in this (and other threads) to date, though. (e.g. tor -> eff.org; dns -> okturtles.com). There's inevitably *someone* who needs to take a lead on coordinating any codebase, if the codebase is to produce anything useful. I'm suggesting that that person could easily register a domain. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
