On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:58:47PM -0800, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote a message of 76 lines which said:
> this is good work. I fully agree. But do note we did not discuss yet the alternatives (draft-wijngaards-dnsop-confidentialdns, DNScrypt or simply IPsec). The BoF "DNS encryption" in London seems a good start <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart> and <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnse/charter/>. > i recommend it be adopted by the working group, DNSOP? Some people say it is outside the charter since it is a modification of the protocol. I myself are not favorable to an ultra-strict interpretation of the charter so I'll hummmmmm with you. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
