Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > I am not sure I am so sanguine, but this put in my mind the > draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize draft, which I now realise was never > published as an RFC. > > I'd like this thread to discuss the "so what, use TCP!" remark.
Nice idea. http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2013-09/dnstcp.html > I'd also like to ask either the chairs or the WG whether > draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-14 needs revision and, if so, what revision to > be publishable, because I think it's needed advice. It needs to cover the effect of EDNS0 pseudo-records on truncation, and the extra DNSSEC records that appear in secure referrals. What about the interaction between EDNS buffer size and MTU and middleboxes? Haya Shulman has some attacks that could be discussed in the security considerations section. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
