In message <e7568ee8-99d1-422b-9b24-40d6d0cfe...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad writes: > Hi, > > On Dec 7, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Tim Wicinski <tim.wicin...@teamaol.com> wrote: > > We're kicking off the Working Group Last call on Adding 100.64.0.0/10 > prefixes to IPv4 Locally-Served DNS Zones Registry. The author believe > that this document has addressed all the issues raised on the document. > The latest version of the draft is available at: > > > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00.txt > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00 > > > > Because of this last call is surrounded by the upcoming holiday season, > we're making this a four (4) week last call cycle. > > Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for advancing > this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial > > suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. The chairs will send > in their comments as well during the last call period. This last call will > > conclude on January 3rd, 2014. > > I've read the document and I think there might be a bit of an issue: > > It appears we now have multiple registries listing the same information. > Specifically: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/locally-served-dns-zones/locally-served-dn > s-zones.xhtml > > seems to be a subset of
David you need to learn the definition of subset. They are overlapping sets. > http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domai > n-names.xhtml > > Options to deal with this: > 1. revise the IANA considerations section to indicate that both > registries need to be updated > 2. remove the locally served zones from the special-use-domain-names > registry > 3. merge the two registries into a single uber-wonky-name registry > 4. give up on this DNS thing as it was clearly a mistake and go back to > ip address literals > > While the last option is looking more and more appealing, I'm personally > leaning towards option 3, adding a column that says how the name should > be dealt with (e.g., "locally served via DNS", "never touch the wire", > "non-DNS", etc.). > > Regards, > -drc > > P.S. There should probably be a better way to find these registries -- I > had to resort to Google and clicking around to find both registries. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
