Hi all, The authors would very much appreciate people here casting their eye over this text, and providing feedback on (a) clarity of the text and (b) technical viability of the approach.
Thanks, Joe Begin forwarded message: > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-00.txt > Date: 6 November 2013 at 10:58:36 PST > To: Joe Abley <jab...@dyn.com>, George G. Michaelson <g...@apnic.net>, George > Michaelson <g...@apnic.net>, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net>, Brian Dickson > <bdick...@verisign.com> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Joe Abley and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname > Revision: 00 > Title: AS112 Redirection using DNAME > Creation date: 2013-11-05 > Group: dnsop > Number of pages: 23 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-00.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-00 > > > Abstract: > Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that > are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in > RFC 1918 for private use within individual sites. > > Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name > System (DNS) queries (so-called "reverse lookups") corresponding to > those private-use addresses. Since the addresses concerned have only > local significance, it is good practice for site administrators to > ensure that such queries are answered locally. However, it is not > uncommon for such queries to follow the normal delegation path in the > public DNS instead of being answered within the site. > > It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to > such queries. In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use > addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of > such queries is large and growing. The AS112 project aims to provide > a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on > the IN-ADDR.ARPA authoritative servers. The AS112 project is named > after the Autonomous System Number (ASN) that was assigned to it. > > The AS112 project does not accommodate the addition and removal of > DNS zones elegantly. Since additional zones of definitively local > significance are known to exist, this presents a problem. This > document describes modifications to the deployment and use of AS112 > infrastructure that will allow zones to be added and dropped much > more easily. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
