On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
Our zone is not the start of any chain of trust
That's a TLD corner case (and not entirely true at that, since you don't really know what I configure as trust anchor in my resolver) There are many more parent-child relationships then just the registry-registrar-registrant case which involves other paths of trusts like EPP. The CDS draft, while it can also be used there, will likely see more significant use elsewhere in the chain, so please let's not focus the discussion of this draft to the RRR business. That said, I'm still with the authors. Keep the CDS format identical to the DS format. (and let parent and child local policy determine what to do with the CDS RRset) To get back to the draft: I have not seen too many people talk about the CNS/GLUE record types. Should those be in this draft, a separate draft, or no where? Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
