Dear WG, > Please respond by the end of next week, so that we could ask future > editors to submit a renamed -00 version by Monday, Feb 18.
thanks to all who responded and especially to those three volunteer reviewers. However, we've not met the 5 reviewer threshold, so your chairs agreed the WG might want to spend a bit more time given that interest was signalled. The current authors are encouraged to fold in comments they received on this list and also we'd like to see discussion on content so that there might be a broader base next time. We will be going to start negotiating goals and milestones with our new AD in Orlando and will keep this topic in mind, but we also need a strong WG commitment to work on a draft. This means we'll not have a draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-omniscient this time, but no more, no less: nobody should be discouraged from making comments on this draft, the floor remains open. Best regards, Peter (as DNSOP co-chair) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
