On 23/10/2012 09:46, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 23 Oct 2012, at 14:29, Miek Gieben wrote:
The paragraph is a *suggestion* in a *bcp*.
I don't see what point you're trying to make with this remark.
Indeed, if the suggestion is not congruent with current practice,
it seems to me that it very much ought not to belong in a so-called
"Best Current Practice". You seem to be emphasizing Antoin's
position; but then you object to it.
ATB
/Niall
As I disagree with the general applicability of Antion's proposal and
consider it a paternalistic overreach I think rfc4641bis should go
forward w/o change.
While I think the idea of passing keys though the registry between
operator has some merit I do not see it as viable alternative outside
few cc'tld's thus it it does not deserve to be included in a BCP without
full debate.
Olafur
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
