The referenced draft seems strongly related to DNSOP as well,
but to avoid cross-posting, here's only the initial part of
my review just posted to the dnsext mailing list.
-------- start of forwarded message --------
Hi,
I've performed a quick review of the DNSEXT-related I-D,
draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-02
and would like to submit a few notes.
(A) Significant issues
(A.1)
Firstly, I'm surprised by the non-trivial overlap of this work
with RFC 6303 and the IANA Registry created by it, the "AS112" RFCs,
and the ongoing work-in-progress to address more emerging overload
reasons for the authoritative root/infrastructure DNS servers by
extending the scope of the AS112 project, registering more "special"
domain names in that "Locally Served DNS Zones" IANA registry, and
specifying that they be treated as specified in RFC 6303.
The present draft not even quotes RFC 6303 for Sect. 5.1, where
the largest overlap with RFC 6303 occurs. (I have not yet studied
in detail inhowfar the new specification in that section is
compatible or collides with the normative behavior specified in
RFC 6303.)
[...snip...]
-------- end of forwarded message --------
To see the full review, please refer to the copy archived in the
DNSEXT list archive:
<http://www.IETF.ORG/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg12376.html>
Kind regards,
Alfred Hönes.
--
+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes | Alfred Hoenes Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys. |
| Gerlinger Strasse 12 | Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18 |
| D-71254 Ditzingen | E-Mail: a...@tr-sys.de |
+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
