On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
We need to figure out the best way to automate the DNS
consequences of adding a new IPv6 prefix, or removing an old
one, in all or part of an enterprise network. So we need to
understand how it interacts with DHCPv6. Basically I think
you're saying that in real life we can't expect end hosts to be
responsible for their own DNS updates when renumbered, because
that requires an unreasonable key distribution mechanism.

End hosts that use Kerberos do have a key distribution model that works, and I 
_think_ there's an RFC that describes how to do that, but I may be 
mistaken—it's not really my department.   I'd like to see the key problem 
solved, but as it stands I think Active Directory is the only system that 
really has it solved.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to