Matthjis,

thank you for reviewing the document. The intention is to cover those aspects 
you mention (key separation, number of keys and roll-over scheme) in sections 
6.4, 6.5 and 6.6. It is also intended that a drafter of a DPS may put a 
rationale, explaining why a particular scheme has been choosen, directly in the 
main component (6).

For this reason, I'm concerned that a new component may overlap with those 
already existing. However, I do agree that the intentions described above are 
not very clear (section 4.6.4 - 4.6.6 of the document), and could be explained 
in more detail. Would that fulfil your purpose, or did I misunderstand you?

 -- Fredrik Ljunggren


On 16 jun 2011, at 23:37, Matthijs Mekking <matth...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:

> I have read it and have one comment:
> 
> I would have expect that section 4.6. on Zone Signing would have a
> subcomponent on Signing Scheme. Such a subcomponent would address the
> number of keys used for signing and what roles (zsk, ksk) they fulfill.
> 
> I would like to see this addition and I support its publication as
> Informational.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Matthijs
> 
> 
> On 06/13/2011 07:22 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> Dear DNSOP WG,
>> 
>> This is to initiate a working group last call (WGLC) on
>> 
>>      "DNSSEC Policy & Practice Statement Framework"
>>       draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-04.txt
>> 
>> Owing to the length of the document, the WGLC will last for three weeks
>> instead of the usual two, and will therefore end on
>> 
>>             Monday, 4 July 2011, 23:59 UTC
>> 
>> The IETF tools site gives easy access to the current and previous
>> versions, as well as differences and the like, at:
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-04
>> 
>> The document is aimed at a status of "Informational".
>> 
>> Please review the document and send any comments you may have to the
>> list.  If you have no comments but support (or do not support) the
>> document being published, please send that information to the list.
>> 
>> The document is subject to the normal five reviewer threshold.
>> 
>>    Stephen and Peter
>>     DNSOP co-chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to