Le 22 déc. 2010 à 09:06, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit : > John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote >> Take a look... http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-levine-iprangepub-00.txt > > ... I suggest to completely drop the acronym CIDR, which is not > necessary in IPv6, which was always classless.
1. May I suggest "prefix" in place of "CIDR range" 2. Also, as a range is typically defined by first and last value, I believe the title might better avoid the word. It could be, for example: "An efficient method to publish IP-address prefixes in the DNS" Regards, RD _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
