----- Forwarded message from Fred Baker <f...@cisco.com> ----- This is a structured question for the community.
Jari Arkko tells us that he is getting requests from various sources to take RFC 5006 to Proposed Standard. It is now experimental. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5006.txt 5006 IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configuration. J. Jeong, Ed., S. Park, L. Beloeil, S. Madanapalli. September 2007. (Format: TXT=26136 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL) (1) Please take a look at the document in the next few days; if you have comments on it (eg, you think it should be changed in some way), please comment to v6ops. (2) Vendors, please advise on implementations. Are there any? Has interoperability been demonstrated? (3) Operators, enterprise and/or service provider, please advise on deployment experience. I'm adding a brief discussion to the agenda Monday morning with a view to getting a quick thumbs-up/thumbs-down to advise Jari, who can then take that to 6man later in the week if appropriate. BTW, I have had a flurry of email related to the agenda. The current agenda may be found at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/v6ops.html ----- End forwarded message ----- morning folks... any thoughts on this draft changing status? --bill _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
