Chris Thompson wrote: > On Mar 17 2010, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > >> Should of course have checked hostname.bind, which reveals: >> >> % dig @202.12.27.33 hostname.bind ch txt +short >> "M-CDG-3" >> % dig @2001:dc3::35 hostname.bind ch txt +short >> "M-CDG-4" >> >> So it seems my guess of Paris or thereabouts wasn't too far off. And >> M-CDG-3 seems to have problems with TCP.
Well, I'm getting IPv6 replies from M-CDG-2 which should be in Paris as well. I have perfect ping responses (30ms, no packet loss). And TCP works except for the ANY query... so that doesn't quite look like a stressed network. > That would explain why I don't see the effect at all. I am getting > M-NRT-JPIX-3 for IPv4 and M-CDG-4 for IPv6 (over either UDP or TCP). I would love to know why your get M-CDG-4 and I get M-CDG-2... I'd guess that your packets should take the janet-geant-sfinx route? Gilles -- Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU 6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg tel: (+352) 424409 fax: (+352) 422473 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
