Colleagues,

I have just posted RFC4641bis version 2.

The document contains a number of significant changes which address a number of 
the open-issues (see 
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/svn/rfc4641bis/trunk/open-issues/). In some cases text 
has been rewritten in such a way that it is not immediately obvious if some of 
the open issues are still relevant. Since today was the last opportunity for me 
to submit the document before the cut-off and I believe the text is close 
enough for review on substance and gathering feedback. 

Although a review on (english) style, nits and spelling would be appreciated I 
believe that can wait until the review on substance has taken place.


http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-02.txt

Once the document is available through the tools interface you should be able 
to study the diffs.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis


--Olaf

________________________________________________________ 

Olaf M. Kolkman                        NLnet Labs
                                       Science Park 140, 
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/               1098 XG Amsterdam

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to