Hi, On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Indeed LOCAL.ARPA would need to be unsigned. > Not really. Why would it need to exist in the public tree at all? > All we need is agreement from both ICANN and IETF that LOCAL.ARPA is > reserved and not to be delegated in the official tree.
Entries in the ARPA tree are (now) only created by the IAB or a protocol action. ICANN merely implements what we're told. I'd suggest an IANA considerations section that simply said that "LOCAL.ARPA" is reserved and must not be delegated. Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
