In message <4a9c0725.40...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> Saw this on another list and thought that the folks on this one might
> be interested: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00
>
> Abstract
>
> In IPv4, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) commonly provide IN-
> ADDR.ARPA. information by prepopulating the zone with one PTR
> record for every available address. This practice does not scale
> in IPv6. This document analyses different approaches to managing
> the ip6.arpa zone for broadband customers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
This was on the adgena for DNSOP at the last IETF 75. There was
much discussion. Not all of use agree with the analysis in that
document though I think there was consensus that ISP's shouldn't
need to per-populate reverse IPv6 zones.
4.4) draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00.txt
[Alain Durand][15 min][10:30]
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
