At 8:16 AM -0400 7/16/09, Livingood, Jason wrote: > > I'll speak for my parents here: a DNS resolver that reduces the chance that > > they'll get a drive-by malware >> infection is something they would happily use. Having said that, a DNS >> resolver that gives them a page of >> search results instead of the browser's error page when they mistype a URL >> is something the *do not* want >> because it increases their confusion. > >IMHO malicious bots are an extremely concerning problem, and the problem of >bot infections is much more widespread than many people realize. I'm in the >early stages of contributing to a bot-related draft at ><http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oreirdan-mody-bot-remediation-00>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oreirdan-mody-bot-remediation-00 > in case anyone is interested in providing private feedback (haven't really >found a WG appropriate for the work).
I hope that redirection is not an indicator that the -01 draft will continue to talk about the two scenarios as if they are somewhat equivalent. At 4:14 PM +0000 7/16/09, Suzanne Woolf wrote: >I hope redirect-01 is more strictly descriptive and can drop defensive >terms for DNS redirect, like "enhancement" of the "user experience", >since it's by no means agreed that crippling DNSSEC (for example) >enhances the value of the Internet for anyone. +1. You can talk about why you are doing what you are doing without making it seem that the positive values are going to be be worth the negative side-effects. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
