* Alan Barrett: > I think that this sort of lying recursive resolver is a bad idea. > Instead, I suggest a new "SUGGESTION" RR type that could be returned > in the additional section of an error message. For example, if > you ask for www.example.invalid, you could get back an NXDOMAIN > error, with "SUGGESTION URL=http://10.2.3.4/www.example.invalid"; > in the additional section, and if you ask for censored.example. > you could get back a SERVFAIL response with "SUGGESTION > URL=http://10.2.3.4/why-we-censor.html"; in the additional section.
This would be protocol development, so it's out of the scope of this WG. There's also the problem that some folks want to do DNS rewriting *now*. If client-side changes are required, they fear that they will out of business before they are implemented. (But I agree that a clean solution requires protocol development.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
