On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:28:01PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>
> >>Section 3: "Priming can occur when the validating resolver starts, but a
> >>validating resolver SHOULD defer priming of individual trust anchors
> >>until each is first needed for verification." I disagree with this as a
> >>SHOULD; "may want to" is much more appropriate. I see nothing wrong with
> >>wanting to get the first round of crypto out of the way at startup.
> >
> >Good point,
> >How about s/SHOULD/MAY want to/ ?
>
> I think that would be "COULD" then....
i think i am going to weigh in on th eother side of the coin here.
I'd posit s/SHOULD/SHOULD NOT/ ... Is there any good reason why
validation and resolution need to be in lock-step?
--bill
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
