>>>>> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:44:42 -0700, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> >>>>> said: DB> I've read the draft at the URL above and am generally supportive of DB> its moving forward.
Doug, Thanks for responding with a review about the Management Requirements document. I've applied all your very useful changes to the draft. I only had a question/comment about one of them: DB> 3.1.1 Needed Control Operations DB> The ability to do a reload on an individual zone should probably be DB> mentioned here. That's probably a good point but I think it's worth checking to make sure anyone else reading this has a problem with this. Supporting partial reloads (be that split line along a zone data set or something more granular) is potentially more intensive than a complete reload. You're right the original text didn't really specify anything (though it implied a complete reload). How does this bullet replacement sound: OLD: Reloading zone data NEW: Reloading some or all of the zone data sets I'm not sure "sets" should be in there or not... I think it conveys the boundary line better though. -- "In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap, and much more difficult to find." -- Terry Pratchett _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
