SM wrote:
At 10:17 18-03-2009, Joe Abley wrote:
I can't comment on that directive in particular (if indeed such a
directive with that name exists, per later mail) but in general I find
it a feature that a document with operational focus addressed to the
whole Internet should steer clear of regional policy requirements.
I couldn't find such a directive. The question might have been raised
due to some confusion with the directive about data protection. The
draft is about the requirements for a management system for DNS name
servers instead of country-specific policy requirements.
The Data Integrity and Security Models apply to the DNS systems as well.
Since these are key to the security models which are used to protect
privacy impacted and financial data they are also included. I think
this is inherently obvious, in fact its so obvious that arguing about it
is silly. The access model for the (seamless information control/access
process) at hand is also controlled by the Data Integrity directives
too. The idea that the systems which control access to these protected
data are not also protected is laughable IMHO
Todd
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
