On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:27:21AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:04:42PM -0400, > Andrew Sullivan <a...@shinkuro.com> wrote > a message of 59 lines which said: > > > John's view is that the original "alphabetic restriction" in 1123 > > was indeed intended as a restriction, > > I was not there at the creation but I find it worrying to rely on the > recollection of one specific person. The "alphabetic-only" rule in RFC > 1123 is just a side note, never detailed, and presented as a fact > (which it was at this time), not as a mandatory restriction.
we -could- ask the author of RFC 1123. --bill _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop