On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:27:21AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:04:42PM -0400,
> Andrew Sullivan <a...@shinkuro.com> wrote
> a message of 59 lines which said:
>
> > John's view is that the original "alphabetic restriction" in 1123
> > was indeed intended as a restriction,
>
> I was not there at the creation but I find it worrying to rely on the
> recollection of one specific person. The "alphabetic-only" rule in RFC
> 1123 is just a side note, never detailed, and presented as a fact
> (which it was at this time), not as a mandatory restriction.
we -could- ask the author of RFC 1123.
--bill
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
