Today's Behave agenda includes DNS.
Behave AGENDA
SESSION TWO
THURSDAY, 09:00-11:30
...
9:55 NAT64 (Marcelo
Bagnulo, 25)
draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64
10:20 DNS64 (Marcelo
Bagnulo, 20)
draft-bagnulo-behave-dns64
On 2008Nov20, at 10:22 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
In your previous mail you wrote:
So they are aware that this is broken. Let's hope that this type of
service discovery through a fraction DNS root doesn't make its way
into the final standard.
=> I agree but what you propose to do? There will be a double session
of behave WG tomorrow afternoon but this draft (which is not a WG
item)
is not in the agenda, so IMHO it is not useful to worry behave chairs.
Perhaps we should only say the document should not become a WG item
if the defect is not repaired first (i.e., get it killed or fixed)?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
