David Conrad wrote: >> however, my view is that getting comprehensive buy-in >> would take quite a lot more time and effort than this method. > > is the common excuse that results in lots of broken crap on the > Internet. It is sad to see the same mistake repeated again and again.
Prove me wrong, then. You can send a message to the Technical Contacts of all 284 domains (I can supply you with a list) saying "Please set up a resilient, highly-available web service to provide current data on your registration structure." See what sort of reaction you get. >>> How can non-TLD's get into this list!? >> Just by asking; I already got an email from CentralNIC. > > If there is no vetting, doesn't this defeat the purpose? Who says there's no vetting? How does adding e.g. CentralNIC defeat the purpose? In some ways, it is the purpose; CentralNIC customers will no longer be able to conspire to damage users privacy, and if users accidentally mis-set cookies, other CentralNIC customers can't steal them. Gerv _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
