On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:42:10PM +0100, Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said:
> The editors have submitted -05 as an attempt to cover the discussing > ADs' concerns and we are - together with our AD - continuing work to > get the DISCUSSes cleared. The problem is that some are quite bogus. For instance, https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil/comment/72422/ describes in detail why someone might not trust his ISP's resolver (something quite obvious and with which we all agree) and then jumps directly to say that the only solution is to allow ORNS, ignoring the other solutions mentioned in the draft. Is it really necessary to "address" such not-well-thought-out comments? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
