On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:44:56PM -0500, William F. Maton Sotomayor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 35 lines which said:
> I think what would need to be worked out is what criteria would be > used to declare a local or nonsense domain, nonsense or junk, and > have that suitably delegated to AS112. IETF Consensus? Expert review? :-) > or it could be we need to take whatever floats to the top 25 of a > domain lookup chart. That's certainly the good way and that's why I pointed to such a chart at the beginning of this thread. > Of course, someone needs to determine what makes a good sample to > create that statistic. IMHO, it (this determination) could be outsourced to the root name servers operators. The distribution of these broken domain names is exponential with a fast decay. So, even adding only the first two or three would handle most of the problem. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
