Kim,
> The announcement was posted on 24 October to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> as well as some other closed lists. I didn't send it to DNSOP as I
> figured it was out of the group's charter of "developing guidelines",
thanks for your careful consideration. I'd agree this is a reasonable judgement.
> but I will note that for the future. If there are any other appropriate
> places for such announcements to be sent I'd be happy to include them
> for the future.
To the extent that we are discussing resolver priming (now you could argue
_me_ should not make this assessment) and DNS software defaults, one
of these rare instances of an address change could have equally reasonable
be seen in-scope. I appreciate your extra effort and see it as a courtesy,
not an obligation.
-Peter
{hat on, this time}
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
