[Resending with fixed subject line, sorry for the duplication --sra] At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT), Dean Anderson wrote: > > I would like to have the WG discuss taking up my draft > (draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status) as a WG document. > > Thanks, > > --Dean
<hat wg-co-chair="on"> Per Dean's request, I asked those WG participants who were present at the Chicago meeting two questions: Q1) How many had read Dean's draft? A1) 12 people claimed to have read Dean's draft. Q2) Of those who had read Dean's draft, how many supported adoption as of Dean's draft as a WG document instead of draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations A2) Nobody present in the room supported adoption of Dean's draft. As with any decision made at a face to face meeting this is not official until confirmed on the mailing list. So if there is anyone who: 1) Has read Dean's draft, and 2) Supports WG adoption of Dean's draft, please speak up. The chairs will assume that Dean himself has read and supports his own draft. Anybody else? Silence will be taken as confirmation of the tentitive decision from the face to face meeting, as will off-topic postings. So if you want the WG to adopt this draft, please say so calmly and distinctly. Cut-off for this confirmation call will be 00:00:00 UTC on 19 August 2007. This is longer than I would ordinarily wait for a confirmation call, but many people take holidays in August, and Dean has done the right thing here by offering the WG an alternative draft for consideration rather than just complaining about the draft that he opposes, so I want to make sure that Dean's alternative draft gets a fair chance. </hat> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop