> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:57:35PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > > I also concur with the various protests against using . for the RNAME,
> > > and would suggest instead "nobody.localhost." along with a ref to
> > > 2606. That should be sufficiently clear to any human who looks at it,
> > > and also meets the goal of not providing any useful data to a spam bot.
> >
> > Not "nobody.invalid."?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is likely to be a real mailbox.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] should bounce.
>
> why do you think so?
a) nobody exists on lots of boxes. Not all boxes alias nobody
to something that gets read. b) localhost is usually correctly
processes to mean deliver locally.
Put (a) and (b) together and you have mail going into a black
hole.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > --
> > Mark Andrews, ISC
> > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
