[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Sullivan) writes: > I note that in section 2.2.3, we have this: > > A zone's name servers should be reachable by all IP transport > protocols (e.g., IPv4 and IPv6) in common use. > > I have read differing opinions on whether it is better to have > protocol-dedicated servers (on the grounds that it makes > troubleshooting in a world of poorly implemented dual stacks easier) > or to have all-protocol name servers. I think therefore that the > reasoning for the above claim should be spelled out in more detail.
what i meant was that a zone should have servers reachable by every IP transport protocol in common use, in order that the zone be reachable by all DNS initiators no matter what IP transport protocol they're using. i can see that the writing as quoted above is sloppy, and doesn't say what i thought it said, and i can clean it up if the WG thinks it's important. > Other than that, I think this is a good and useful draft, and should > be advanced. me too! -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
