Hi Dean,

On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:31:36AM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:

> No; I looked further into the context of that statement, and I cited
> that context to you in my previous message: The purpose of the TCP
> Wrappers tool was to provide _logs_ for programs which didn't produce
> logs and for which source code wasn't available.  I showed you the logs
> produced by the tool which were given as examples in the paper.

As I said in my response already, I don't think this is different in
any way except the level of detail.  The point of getting the logs
was, as the paper says, to find out where on the network the
connection originated.  For the purposes of the draft, I think the
level of detail is enough.  The draft is already getting pretty long
given its topic, so I don't think I want to add the extra detail; but
if others disagree with me, I will cheerfully include your
suggestions.  (By the way, I appreciate that you are willing to
comment on the draft, since you said that there is no way it could be
modified to address your concerns.  But also due to that statement by
you, I believe we've been released from trying to address concerns you
raise, since every attempt is apparently guaranteed to fail.)

> major difference between our drafts: Your draft presents discredited
> practices as credulous, while I provide the full context, including the
> fact that these practices were discredited.

I suppose you mean "credible"; I believe what the
reverse-mapping-considerations draft says is that in some
circumstances, it _is_ a credible practice.  As I've said before, this
is not "my draft" but the working group's; I'm just editing it.  The
feedback that I've received so far is broadly that there are cases
where using reverse mapping is a useful practice for them (although
there are some who disagree with that, such as you).  Since some of
that feedback comes from people who are apparently otherwise
competent to speak on these topics (e.g. they operate networks, they
write protocols, &c.), I take their remarks to be informed ones.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                              M2P 2A8
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 +1 416 646 3304 x4110

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to