On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:23:29AM -0800, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if you would mind cutting a release that includes this
> patch:
> https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=f006be7842104a9f86fbf419326b7aad08ade61d
> -- this bug was very impactful to OpenStack Ironic (thank you for fixing
> it!) and getting it in a release will enable our users to consume this fix.
>
> If there's anything I can do to help make this happen, please let me know.
>
Items on my wish list:
* Various patches reviewed and judged. Examples of verdicts:
* Patch has been reviewed and is rejected, no further comment. [0]
* Patch has been seen and was inspiration for another commit.
* Patch applied, thanks.
* Patch needs reworks, foo needs to bar. [1]
* Coding style
* A release that is in Debian testing before the freeze in Januari.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
[0] The good thing of a Reject is that it prevents further expectations.
(No one spending energy on "when should I ask again?", energy that
can be spend elsewhere.)
[1] "foo" and "bar" being placeholders. The rework description will
indeed eat human energy. So be it, just imagine a better dnsmasq.
--
Silence is hard to parse
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
